Evaluation is the process of systematically assessing the design, implementation, outcomes, or impact of a program, intervention, policy, product, or service. For students, learning evaluation skills is highly valuable because it teaches critical thinking, research design, data collection, data analysis, and clear reporting.
These projects also build practical experience in real-world problem solving and can be directly useful for college assignments, thesis work, internships, or job portfolios.
This article lists 25 well-developed evaluation project ideas. Each idea is written for students: the language is simple, the structure is practical, and the tasks are actionable. When selecting a project, consider the context you have access to (school, community, online platforms), the timeframe, and the data you can collect.
Many projects can use surveys, interviews, observation, administrative records, or secondary datasets. If you need to adapt a project to local needs or scale it up, the project structure below makes that straightforward.
Use this article as a blueprint. You can copy-paste sections into a proposal, adapt the evaluation questions, or expand any part into a full report. At the end of the list you’ll find tips for writing a strong evaluation report and a clear closing summary.
Must Read: 25 Rock Cycle Project Ideas For Students 2026-27
How to use these ideas
- Pick a topic that interests you and fits available resources.
- Refine a clear evaluation question (e.g., “Did program X improve Y?”).
- Choose feasible methods (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed).
- Collect or locate data ethically (get consent when needed).
- Analyze results, draw conclusions, and recommend actions.
- Write your report with clear headings: Background, Methods, Results, Discussion, Recommendations.
25 Evaluation Project Ideas
1. Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Peer Tutoring Program in School
Overview: Assess whether a peer tutoring program improves student performance and confidence.
Objective: Measure academic gains and changes in student attitudes.
Data sources: Test scores, pre/post confidence surveys, attendance records, tutor logs.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Pre/post comparison of test scores (mean change), percentage passing, survey Likert scores, attendance changes.
Tools & techniques: Excel/SPSS for quantitative analysis; simple thematic analysis for open comments.
Steps: (1) Define participant groups (tutored vs non-tutored). (2) Collect baseline test and survey. (3) Implement tutoring over a term. (4) Collect endline data. (5) Compare outcomes and report.
Deliverables: Evaluation report, data tables, recommendations for program scaling.
Difficulty: Low–Medium.
2. Evaluating a School’s Digital Learning Platform Adoption
Overview: Determine how effectively students and teachers use a digital learning platform.
Objective: Assess adoption, usability, and impact on learning outcomes.
Data sources: Platform usage logs, teacher interviews, student surveys, grades.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Usage frequency, active user percentage, correlation of platform use with grades, SUS (System Usability Scale) score.
Tools & techniques: Google Analytics (or platform analytics), Excel, basic statistical tests.
Steps: (1) Obtain usage and performance data. (2) Survey users about usability. (3) Analyze relationship between usage and performance. (4) Synthesize findings.
Deliverables: Dashboard of usage, usability summary, recommendations for training.
Difficulty: Medium.
3. Evaluating a Health Awareness Campaign in College
Overview: Measure knowledge and behavior change after an awareness campaign (e.g., mental health, hygiene).
Objective: Determine short-term knowledge gains and reported behavior changes.
Data sources: Pre/post knowledge quizzes, behavior self-reports, attendance at events.
Evaluation methods & metrics: % correct answers pre/post, self-reported behavior change percentages, event reach.
Tools & techniques: Surveys (Google Forms), simple statistical tests, charts.
Steps: (1) Design knowledge questionnaire. (2) Conduct pre-test. (3) Run the campaign. (4) Conduct post-test. (5) Compare and report.
Deliverables: Summary of knowledge gains, recommended follow-ups.
Difficulty: Low.
4. Evaluating the Impact of a Career Counselling Workshop on Student Readiness
Overview: Assess whether workshops increase students’ career planning knowledge and confidence.
Objective: Measure change in career readiness indicators.
Data sources: Pre/post surveys, follow-up interviews, number of students creating resumes or applying for internships.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Changes in Likert scale responses, counts of actionable steps taken, qualitative feedback.
Tools & techniques: Excel, qualitative coding.
Steps: (1) Measure baseline readiness. (2) Run workshop. (3) Measure immediate and 3-month follow-up outcomes. (4) Analyze and report.
Deliverables: Recommendations for future workshops, sample materials.
Difficulty: Low–Medium.
5. Evaluating an NGO Food Distribution Program’s Efficiency
Overview: Analyze how efficiently food reaches intended beneficiaries and whether nutritional outcomes improved.
Objective: Assess distribution efficiency and short-term nutritional indicators.
Data sources: Distribution logs, beneficiary interviews, weight/BMI records if available.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Timeliness of distribution, percentage of target reached, beneficiary satisfaction.
Tools & techniques: Process mapping, simple stats.
Steps: (1) Map distribution process. (2) Sample beneficiaries for interviews. (3) Compare planned vs actual distribution. (4) Produce recommendations.
Deliverables: Efficiency report, process improvements.
Difficulty: Medium.
6. Evaluating a Mobile App Prototype for Study Planning
Overview: Test usability and effectiveness of an app designed to help students plan study schedules.
Objective: Assess usability, engagement, and short-term effect on study habits.
Data sources: App analytics, SUS usability survey, time-use diaries.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Task completion rates, SUS score, changes in self-reported study hours.
Tools & techniques: Usability testing, Google Forms, basic analytics.
Steps: (1) Recruit testers. (2) Observe usability tasks. (3) Collect pre/post study habit data. (4) Analyze and recommend design changes.
Deliverables: Usability report, prioritized fixes.
Difficulty: Medium.
7. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Anti-Bullying Policy in a School
Overview: Measure whether anti-bullying policies reduce incidents and improve school climate.
Objective: Track incident rates, perceptions, and policy adherence.
Data sources: Incident reports, student/teacher surveys, focus groups.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Incident frequency, perception of safety (Likert), policy compliance rate.
Tools & techniques: Trend analysis, qualitative synthesis.
Steps: (1) Compile incident data over time. (2) Survey school community. (3) Run focus groups. (4) Recommend policy or training updates.
Deliverables: Policy evaluation, training module suggestions.
Difficulty: Medium–High.
8. Evaluating the Impact of Remote Learning on Student Performance
Overview: Compare performance during remote vs in-person instruction periods.
Objective: Identify differences in grades, engagement, and challenges.
Data sources: Exam scores across periods, attendance logs, student surveys.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Mean score comparisons, attendance rate changes, reported barriers.
Tools & techniques: T-tests, regression if controlling for covariates.
Steps: (1) Select comparable periods. (2) Clean data. (3) Compare outcomes and analyze qualitative feedback. (4) Report.
Deliverables: Comparative analysis, recommendations for blended models.
Difficulty: Medium.
9. Evaluating Customer Satisfaction for a Small Business
Overview: Assess customer satisfaction and identify areas for improvement for a local shop or café.
Objective: Measure satisfaction levels, repeat purchase intent, and service issues.
Data sources: Short customer surveys, sales data, mystery shopper observations.
Evaluation methods & metrics: NPS (Net Promoter Score), average rating, repeat purchase rates.
Tools & techniques: Google Forms, Excel charts.
Steps: (1) Design short survey. (2) Collect responses at checkout or via QR code. (3) Analyze and present findings with actionable steps.
Deliverables: Customer satisfaction report, prioritized fixes.
Difficulty: Low.
10. Evaluating a Local Recycling Initiative’s Effectiveness
Overview: Determine whether a community recycling drive increases recycling rates and reduces waste.
Objective: Measure waste reduction and community participation rates.
Data sources: Waste collection records, participation counts, resident surveys.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Kilograms recycled, participation rate, change in landfill-bound waste.
Tools & techniques: Basic statistics, charts, process observation.
Steps: (1) Collect pre-program waste data. (2) Track recycling during program. (3) Survey participants on behavior change. (4) Summarize impact and costs.
Deliverables: Impact evaluation, cost-benefit snapshot.
Difficulty: Medium.
11. Evaluating a Soft-Skills Training Program for Students
Overview: Study whether soft-skills workshops (communication, teamwork) increase competency and confidence.
Objective: Measure skill gains and application in academic or internship settings.
Data sources: Pre/post competency self-assessments, trainer evaluations, peer feedback.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Score changes, number of students demonstrating skills in role plays, internship feedback.
Tools & techniques: Surveys, observation rubrics.
Steps: (1) Define core competencies. (2) Use standardized rubrics pre/post. (3) Observe application in projects. (4) Report with improvement suggestions.
Deliverables: Competency report, improved curriculum design.
Difficulty: Low–Medium.
12. Evaluating the Accessibility of Campus Facilities for Students with Disabilities
Overview: Assess physical and informational accessibility across campus.
Objective: Identify accessibility gaps and propose improvements.
Data sources: Site audits, student interviews, policy review.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Compliance checklist score, user satisfaction, list of barriers.
Tools & techniques: Accessibility audit templates, qualitative coding.
Steps: (1) Conduct audits using a checklist. (2) Interview users with disabilities. (3) Rank issues by severity and feasibility. (4) Recommend upgrades.
Deliverables: Accessibility audit report and prioritized action plan.
Difficulty: Medium.
13. Evaluating the Performance of an Online Advertising Campaign for a Student Club
Overview: Measure the campaign’s reach, engagement, and conversion for an event.
Objective: Determine ROI of ad spend and most effective channels.
Data sources: Platform analytics (Facebook, Instagram), event sign-ups, ticket sales.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Impressions, click-through rate, conversion rate, cost per registration.
Tools & techniques: Analytics dashboards, Excel.
Steps: (1) Collect ad metrics. (2) Track sign-ups by link. (3) Compare channels and creatives. (4) Recommend optimizations.
Deliverables: Campaign performance summary and creative recommendations.
Difficulty: Low.
14. Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Reading Intervention for Early Grades
Overview: Test whether a targeted reading program improves fluency and comprehension.
Objective: Measure improvements in reading level and reading fluency.
Data sources: Standardized reading tests, teacher logs, classroom observations.
Evaluation methods & metrics: WCPM (words correct per minute), comprehension scores, grade-level benchmarks.
Tools & techniques: Paired t-tests, growth charts.
Steps: (1) Identify target students. (2) Administer baseline assessment. (3) Deliver intervention for set weeks. (4) Reassess and analyze growth.
Deliverables: Impact report, sample lesson plan.
Difficulty: Medium–High.
15. Evaluating the Outcomes of a Microfinance Program in a Community
Overview: Determine whether microloans improve household income, business activity, or wellbeing.
Objective: Measure economic and social outcomes for participants.
Data sources: Loan records, household income surveys, business records.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Income changes, business survival rates, self-reported wellbeing.
Tools & techniques: Before-after comparison, simple regression.
Steps: (1) Define treatment and comparison groups if possible. (2) Collect baseline and follow-up data. (3) Analyze outcomes and report.
Deliverables: Impact evaluation with recommendations for program design.
Difficulty: High.
16. Evaluating an Anti-Obesity School Nutrition Program
Overview: Assess whether changes in school meals and physical activity reduce BMI or improve diet.
Objective: Track changes in nutrition behavior and physical health markers.
Data sources: Meal menus, BMI records, student diet and activity surveys.
Evaluation methods & metrics: BMI z-scores, dietary diversity scores, participation in PE.
Tools & techniques: Statistical tests for change, program cost analysis.
Steps: (1) Collect baseline health and diet data. (2) Implement program changes. (3) Reassess after 6–12 months. (4) Provide conclusions.
Deliverables: Health outcomes report, sustainability recommendations.
Difficulty: High.
17. Evaluating a Public Transportation Route Change Impact
Overview: Study how a change in bus routes affects commuting time, ridership, and rider satisfaction.
Objective: Measure operational and user-centered outcomes.
Data sources: Ridership data, travel time logs, commuter surveys.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Change in average commute time, ridership growth/decline, satisfaction ratings.
Tools & techniques: Time series analysis, GIS mapping for routes.
Steps: (1) Collect pre-change metrics. (2) Monitor post-change usage. (3) Survey commuters. (4) Analyze and recommend adjustments.
Deliverables: Route impact report and rider feedback summary.
Difficulty: Medium.
18. Evaluating the Environmental Impact of a Tree-Planting Campaign
Overview: Measure survival rates of planted trees and community engagement outcomes.
Objective: Assess ecological and social impacts.
Data sources: Tree survival counts, species records, volunteer participation logs.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Survival percentage, canopy growth estimates, volunteer retention.
Tools & techniques: Field surveys, GIS mapping for locations.
Steps: (1) Tag and record initial plantings. (2) Conduct follow-up counts at 3, 6, 12 months. (3) Analyze survival and factors affecting it. (4) Provide recommendations for species or care changes.
Deliverables: Survival analysis and maintenance plan.
Difficulty: Medium.
19. Evaluating a Student Mental Health Support Service
Overview: Determine whether counseling services reduce distress and improve academic engagement.
Objective: Assess changes in mental health indicators and academic outcomes.
Data sources: Counseling intake/outcome forms, student surveys, attendance/grades.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Pre/post mental health scales (e.g., GAD-7, PHQ-9), retention/attendance changes.
Tools & techniques: Confidential survey administration, anonymized data analysis.
Steps: (1) Secure ethics and consent. (2) Collect baseline scale scores. (3) Track outcomes after counseling. (4) Synthesize findings and confidentiality-preserving recommendations.
Deliverables: Outcome summary, service improvement plan.
Difficulty: High (ethical considerations).
20. Evaluating the Return on Investment (ROI) of a Student Scholarship Program
Overview: Estimate whether scholarships lead to higher graduation rates or better post-graduation outcomes.
Objective: Measure academic and economic returns for scholarship recipients.
Data sources: Scholarship records, graduation rates, alumni employment surveys.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Graduation rate difference, time-to-degree, employment rate post-graduation.
Tools & techniques: Cohort comparison, descriptive statistics.
Steps: (1) Identify scholarship and comparison cohorts. (2) Collect outcome data. (3) Compare and adjust for basic covariates. (4) Report ROI and social benefits.
Deliverables: ROI analysis and policy recommendations.
Difficulty: Medium–High.
21. Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Employee Wellness Program for Campus Staff
Overview: Assess whether wellness activities reduce sick days and improve staff wellbeing.
Objective: Track health-related absenteeism and self-reported wellbeing.
Data sources: HR sick leave records, employee surveys, program participation logs.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Sick days per employee, wellbeing score changes, participation rate.
Tools & techniques: Time series or pre/post comparisons; basic cost-benefit analysis.
Steps: (1) Gather HR data. (2) Conduct baseline survey. (3) Monitor participation and follow-up outcomes. (4) Present findings.
Deliverables: Wellness program impact and recommendations.
Difficulty: Medium.
22. Evaluating Learning Outcomes from Project-Based Learning (PBL)
Overview: Measure if PBL improves critical thinking and subject mastery compared to traditional teaching.
Objective: Assess differences in learning outcomes and student engagement.
Data sources: Assessment scores, rubrics for critical thinking, student surveys.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Rubric-based scores, average test performance, engagement indicators.
Tools & techniques: Mixed-methods analysis combining rubric scores and student interviews.
Steps: (1) Define PBL and control classes. (2) Use standardized rubrics. (3) Collect and compare results. (4) Provide teaching recommendations.
Deliverables: Comparative study and practical tips for PBL adoption.
Difficulty: Medium.
23. Evaluating a Local Tourism Promotion Campaign
Overview: Assess whether marketing efforts increased tourist visits and local spending.
Objective: Measure campaign effectiveness against targets.
Data sources: Tourism footfall records, hotel bookings, social media engagement, vendor sales.
Evaluation methods & metrics: % increase in visitors, average length of stay, revenue indicators.
Tools & techniques: Time series comparison, survey of tourists.
Steps: (1) Collect baseline tourism data. (2) Track during and after campaign. (3) Combine quantitative metrics with visitor feedback. (4) Report ROI and lessons.
Deliverables: Campaign evaluation and future recommendations.
Difficulty: Medium.
24. Evaluating a Local Government’s e-Service Platform for Citizen Requests
Overview: Determine whether an online platform improved response time and citizen satisfaction.
Objective: Track service response indicators and user satisfaction.
Data sources: Platform logs, ticket resolution times, citizen surveys.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Average resolution time, percentage resolved within SLA, satisfaction ratings.
Tools & techniques: Process metrics analysis, simple dashboards.
Steps: (1) Extract platform metrics. (2) Survey a sample of users. (3) Analyze trends and bottlenecks. (4) Recommend process changes.
Deliverables: Service performance report and action items.
Difficulty: Medium.
25. Evaluating the Impact of Sports Programs on Student Wellbeing
Overview: Analyze whether participation in sports programs improves physical health, social skills, and academic performance.
Objective: Measure multiple wellbeing dimensions among participants vs non-participants.
Data sources: Fitness test results, attendance, academic grades, participant surveys.
Evaluation methods & metrics: Fitness score changes, GPA differences, social connectedness scales.
Tools & techniques: Comparative statistics, qualitative interviews.
Steps: (1) Define cohorts. (2) Collect baseline measures. (3) Monitor during season. (4) Analyze multi-dimensional outcomes.
Deliverables: Holistic evaluation linking sports participation to outcomes.
Difficulty: Medium.
Tips for designing and completing your evaluation project
- Start with a clear evaluation question. Replace vague aims (e.g., “see if program works”) with specific, measurable questions (e.g., “Did literacy rates improve by X% after the program?”).
- Use simple, reliable measures. Standardized tests, attendance, and validated survey scales make your findings more credible.
- Consider mixed methods. Combine numbers with interviews or focus groups to understand why results happened.
- Plan ethically. Get consent, protect participant privacy, and anonymize data where appropriate. For sensitive projects (health, counseling), seek faculty approval.
- Be realistic about scope. Choose a manageable sample size and timeframe for a student project. You can do a pilot or case study if resources are limited.
- Document everything. Keep clear records of instruments, data cleaning steps, and analysis code — reviewers appreciate transparency.
- Use visualizations. Simple charts help readers quickly grasp findings. Stick to clear labels and readable tables.
- Write actionable conclusions. Don’t only report results — suggest specific improvements or next steps.
- Report limitations. Acknowledge what your evaluation could not measure or control. This increases trust in your conclusions.
- Practice presentation. Have a 5–10 minute summary slide deck ready — it’s useful for class presentations or defending your methodological choices.
How to structure your final evaluation report (template)
- Title and Abstract — Short summary of what you evaluated and main findings.
- Introduction/Background — Describe the program, why it matters, and your evaluation questions.
- Methods — Explain participants, data sources, instruments, and analysis methods.
- Results — Present key findings with tables and charts.
- Discussion — Interpret results, explain surprising findings, and relate to literature or expectations.
- Recommendations — Practical steps based on your results. Prioritize low-cost, high-impact actions.
- Limitations — Be honest about design limits (sample size, non-random assignment, self-report bias).
- Conclusion — Conclude concisely with what the evaluation means for stakeholders.
- Appendices — Instruments, full data tables, consent forms.
MUST READ: 25 Recycle Material Project Ideas 2026-27
Conclusion
Evaluation is a powerful skill for students to develop. The 25 evaluation project ideas provided in this article cover a wide range of contexts and methods so you can pick a project that fits your interests and resources. Each idea is structured to help you start quickly: you have a clear objective, suggested data sources, evaluation metrics, a stepwise approach, and expected deliverables.
When you begin, pick a manageable scope and be rigorous about measuring before and after changes where possible. Combine quantitative results with qualitative insights to build a full picture of impact. Finally, communicate your findings clearly and offer practical recommendations — that’s how evaluations become useful.
If you want, I can help you turn any one of these ideas into a full project proposal, with a timeline, sample survey questionnaire, and an outline for your final report. Just tell me which idea you choose and I’ll draft the materials you need.
